Politics

You are currently browsing the archive for the Politics category.

gemli is a trusted commenter Boston

The Stooge in Chief should hire representation that resonates with his worldview. I’d suggest the firm of Dewey, Cheatem and Howe.

The job of being the president’s lawyer is tough. It’s bad enough that they’ve got to defend the indefensible, but when they represent a client who’s sleazier than they are it causes confusion in their ranks. Usually it’s the lawyer who’s the slippery eel with questionable bona fides and unsavory connections. But their client puts this shameful lot to shame.

The Stormy storm hasn’t blown over yet. Oh, the tales she could tell, and will tell, once the tangled web of unsigned non-disclosure agreements have been nullified. But as salacious and damning as the details might be, I’m not sure I want them in my imagination. The guy is repugnant enough just standing there fully clothed.

Does it seem as though America has sunk into hole? Weather Armageddon and the mass shooting-du-jour and the psychotic gun lobby and the porn actress infidelity and the nightly slack-jawed pre-adolescent tweet barrage coming from the Oval Office—it seems as though we’ve been thrashing around in a cesspool of despair and disbelief ever since this man body-surfed into office on the waves of his despicable fans who bought tickets to his concert of the damned.

You know it’s bad when Republicans are starting to worry about being in bed with this disreputable lying dog of a plutocrat. Apparently, they’ve gotten up with fleas, and it’s starting to itch.

Tags: ,

gemli is a trusted commenter Boston

I’ve always said that when Mitt Romney enters a room you get the feeling that someone interesting just left. He doesn’t have a presence as much as he creates a void.

But lest anyone think that Romney is a cipher, we should look back at the horrific Republican platform under which he ran for president. The misogyny, the homophobia and the smack-down of all the moochers and takers (remember that?) would make Mitch McConnell smile, and Jeff Sessions fall off of his lily pad.

Sure, why not resurrect Mitt? The wheels are coming off this clown car of an administration, and a blast from the past might provide some much needed comic relief. While we’re at it, let’s see if we can dig up Sarah Palin. It would be nice to see Tina Fey on SNL again.

Mitt and the current squatter in the Oval Office have a few things in common. Both were born with a platinum, jewel-encrusted spoon lodged firmly in their mouths. Both make incomprehensible statements during campaign speeches, and one’s a Mormon, while the other’s a moron. Mere coincidence? I think not.

The president always comes up with insultingly juvenile nicknames for challengers. Hmm, let’s see…what rhymes with Mitt? Ah, Twit! Mitt the Twit! That sounds like something the president would say.

But we’re getting ahead of ourselves. The president is barely a year into his administration, and we’re already flirting with nuclear Armageddon. With any luck, there won’t be a 2020.

Again Totally Hilarious!

Tags: ,

gemli is a trusted commenter Boston

There’s a lot the president is willing to give up, and it’s more than just one or two seasons of Celebrity Apprentice. He’s given up on the poor and middle class. He’s given up our standing in the world. He’s given up trying to find fresh adjectives for “good” and “bad.” He’s long ago given up on nuance, civility, common sense and humility.

(Well, that sort of rhymes, so maybe it’s worth
Trying to finish this comment in verthe–uh, verse:)

When diplomacy matters, you know that he’ll show up, and act like a child who refuses to grow up. He’ll lambaste The Times, and while he’s berating it, he’ll diss the fake news even as he’s creating it.

His big mouth is something I wish we could sew up. It might cost us plenty, but I’d put the dough up, ‘though his tax plan might make the economy blow up.

Obama’s fine legacy he’s sworn to dismantle, although to that man he can’t hold a candle. And if he runs out of people to pillory, he’s likely to turn his attention to Hillary.

As much as he dishes out hate and malaise, he can’t get enough of the vacuous praise. He hires exclusively people who suck up, and then fires them when they—what’s the word–screw up.

And so the strange man in the orange pompadour will dish out embarrassment, and then dish out more. Yet if we impeached him, a year or two hence–we might have to do it again with Mike Pence.

Totally hilarious!

Tags: ,

gemli is a trusted commenter Boston

With this president, every week is Ironic Failure Week. I’m sure that if he announced an upcoming energy conference the lights would go out in the middle of his rambling, self-aggrandizing screed. Then he’d claim that Thomas Edison called him afterwards to apologize for spoiling the greatest speech of all time.

The president deserves an award for every abject failure, because he’s pretty much a defective human being at the molecular level. But what about the ordinary folks who serve as apologists for fraud and deceit?

To recognize their contributions, I propose we have an Unscrupulous Liars Week. The first one would go to Sarah Huckabee Sanders. I thought Sean Spicer took the cake, but he always looked troubled when he lied to make the president’s insane, fraudulent or illegal activities look normal. Sanders apparently watched Spicer from the wings as he sputtered and withered in the glare, and said, “Send me in coach!”

It probably doesn’t hurt that her dad made a living lying to the clueless for money. It’s one of those acorn-tree sorts of things.

The Top Quark is said to be the shortest-lived elementary particle in the universe, but it takes second place to Anthony Scaramucci. He gets the Potty Mouth Award for his meteoric rise to fame, which is a tiny scale model of the president’s private commode. There’s a little figure of Reince Priebus at the bottom of the bowl, caught in mid-swirl.

Tags: ,

Here’s a NYT comment that really says what I believe. This belief of mine has been percolating over the past couple years and represents, I suppose, a turn away from the left but it’s still on the left side of the political spectrum. Anyway, here it is:

gumnaam nowhere 14 hours ago

Senator Sanders, much respect to you, but what about the election in France? A center-right candidate walloped the far right candidate. The main difference: the inability of the Russians to interfere.

The Democratic party is a big-tent party, and cannot function well with ideological purity tests. Policies also have to be achievable, which means listening to all stakeholders. The Democratic sweep in 2006-2008 did not come about because of following a rigid ideological prescription. The Democrats will win by being the party of good governance with new talented candidates across the ideological spectrum. It is well past time to stop beating on people on your own side, and start focusing your ire on the real problem: the Republicans.

Reply 196 Recommended

It’s the second paragraph above that really resonates with me. And especially the very last sentence which states the real problem: the Republicans.

The comment comes from an op-ed by Bernie Sanders in the NYT today: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/opinion/bernie-sanders-how-democrats-can-stop-losing-elections.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region&region=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region

Tags:

David Underwood is a trusted commenter Citrus Heights

For a primer on Trump and his takeover of the GOP, read the series of editorials in the LA Times.
http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-ed-our-dishonest-president/
There are six of them, they are as revealing as anything you have read here.

As many of us feared, he was able to appoint a very conservative judge to the Supreme Court. This has damaged our republic for at least another 40 years. But it is not really Trump who has caused this damage, it is the GOP controlled Senate, trump is just a catalyst, he has given the congress the means to carry on the GOP agenda that is a detriment to the citizenry of the U.S.

The GOP has been working to overturn progressive programs since the 1932 election of FDR. Despite their claims, the GOP is opposed to improving the lives and welfare of the citizens, with the convenient argument that it costs too much.This resonates with those who do not have much to start with, and the majority of the wealthy who are just plain greedy.

Read “The People VS Greed: Stealing America” by J.W. Cotchett.

It is why we don’t have universal health care, High Speed Rail, a decline in retirement plans, affordable education. The list goes on, Trump is just a symptom of niggardly policies of the GOP. They do not say so openly, but he is just what they have wanted for the last 85 years.

We have to start by cleaning up congress, Trump has not power without them.

Reply

Tags: ,

gemli is a trusted commenter Boston 2 hours ago

Forget the Limbo. The bar is set so low for this president that he has to dig his way under it. That he was merely able to read a speech someone else wrote for him suddenly qualified as “presidential.” People seemed to love the fact that he could read, which is a quality you definitely want to see in a president.

Personally, I couldn’t focus on what he was saying because he was standing there with no clothes, although the Republican side of the hall kept jumping up and applauding the fineness of his raiment. I was also distracted by Torquemada and Tweedledum, who were getting the rear view of their puppet. They kept exchanging barely contained grins of relief as he danced without his strings getting tangled.

The So-Called Ruler of the United States (SCROTUS?) should be held to a higher standard, but maybe that’s just me. I’d gotten used to the idea that the president was supposed to be an honorable man who spoke with eloquence, had strength and compassion, inspired confidence and had more than three working neurons.

But the new president has a dream. He talked about a country with financial strength, low unemployment and fair treatment for all, no matter their race, color or creed. It was a country that commanded respect from other nations and negotiated in good faith with them.

Interestingly, that was more or less the country the previous president had left him. If he’d just sit quietly in the Oval Office and do nothing he could do worse. And he probably will.

Reply 172 Recommended

Tags: ,

gemli is a trusted commenter Boston

It’s not as though we had no warning. He was a lying train wreck before the election, and now he’s a lying train wreck after the election There was clearly something wrong with him during the debates with normal human Hillary Clinton, as he stalked, sniffed, spewed random epithets and promised to lock her up while she was in the middle of a sentence.

But there were a lot of resentful people out there in fly-over land who were fed up with having to endure a decent, intelligent and compassionate human in the Oval Office. They wanted someone they could relate to. And now they have him.

A minority of Americans somehow managed to elect a guy who would run the country like they would. How hard could it be? Any moron could do it. But now that any moron is in the position, it’s a different story. You could say they’re having second thoughts, but that would imply that they had a first one, and there’s no evidence of that.

So the deplorables got what they asked for. They mixed cluelessness with a toxic democracy and got kleptocracy. It was in the cards.

There’s no easy way out when a government of the people is rendered dysfunctional by the people.

The only positive thing about this is that if Betsy DeVos wants to dumb down America she won’t have to break a sweat.

Tags:

Published in Carlisle Mosquito, February 12, 1988

Leaders_Cynthia

gemli is a trusted commenter Boston

Mike Pence is adorably naïve if he thinks we’re all going to pack a suitcase and obediently move back to the 1950s. The suavity of his pick—sorry, the president’s pick—for the Supreme Court is irrelevant. We’re not going back just because Judge Gorsuch is smart and wears a nice suit.

Some spineless members of the media have suggested that Gorsuch’s amiable, non-confrontational nature will make it easier for him to achieve consensus among his colleagues on the court. They think if he asks nicely and says please and thank you that the justices will consent to a return to back-alley abortions, ignore climate change and consult the bible to see if evolution should be stricken from school curricula.

It seems to me that “originalism” is a red herring. It’s just a way for Gorsuch and his ilk to ignore inconvenient truths that we’ve learned about the world in the last couple of centuries. So when they want to know how to treat women and gay people, they turn to the wisdom of the Bible.

DJT is a ventriloquist’s dummy with so many hands moving his mouth that you’ve got to wonder how it’s anatomically possible. But the president’s profound ignorance on so many subjects is perfect for the puppeteers who want to shove their racist, misogynistic and homophobic agendas down the country’s throat.

So let’s all be originalists about the Gorsuch issue. We’ll treat him the way Mitch McConnell originally treated Merrick Garland. That should make them happy.

Reply 262 Recommended

Tags: ,

« Older entries