More Warmongering

Scott Horton has a great blog which back in April I posted about in another context. What caught my attention this morning is his post entitled The Roll-Out Presses On. This is analysis of Dick Cheney’s speech to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Here’s a key paragraph:

Is Cheney threatening war against Iran? Yes, that’s exactly what he is doing. As Greg Djerejian reminds us, in the lead-up to the war against Iraq, Cheney gave a number of speeches making clear the intention to resort to arms against Saddam Hussein. And he used exactly the same language, including specifically the key phrase “serious consequences.” And note the focus on the Quds unit of the Revolutionary Guard. This is an exercise in target-practicing. As several sources have noted, Cheney has advocated targeting the Quds unit in the first bombing raids. He and his chief of staff David Addington have also advocated putting the Quds unit on the scheduled list of terrorist organizations, presumably for prior Congressional authorizations for the use of military force canbe drawn upon to justify the attack without the need to go back to Congress.

Leading up to a quote from the oh-so-charming William Kristol, Scott writes:

The first fifteen minutes of Cheney’s Iran speech started with a discussion of Iraq, and made the case that the foe Americans were facing in Iraq was already Iran. This contention is nonsense, of course, a pure fable cooked up to push the war cause. The claim that Iranian explosives are being used by insurgents in Iraq is certainly true. But it has to be considered alongside the fact that the insurgents are fueled much more heavily by weapons and money out of Saudi Arabia, a fact that Cheney would rather not mention.

So, here’s William Kristol on Fox News:

We’re winning in Iraq. That is the absolute crucial precondition to having success in the broader fight against Islamic jihadism. … And I think we are going to have to be serious about dealing with both their intervention in Iraq — which is now the only real threat, I think, incidentally, to relative success in Iraq — and their nuclear program.

Here’s Scott’s concluding paragraph:

Got it? We would win in Iraq, but for the Iranians. Therefore the way to insure victory in Iraq is to wage war on Iran. Who could challenge that logic? And, of course, on Fox News, no one does.

I’ll conclude this post with a quote from the conservative, mainstream intellectual and Newsweek editor, Fareed Zakaria, which I got from Barnett Rubin via Juan Cole:

Here is the reality. Iran has an economy the size of Finland’s and an annual defense budget of around $4.8 billion. It has not invaded a country since the late 18th century. The United States has a GDP that is 68 times larger and defense expenditures that are 110 times greater. Israel and every Arab country (except Syria and Iraq) are quietly or actively allied against Iran. And yet we are to believe that Tehran is about to overturn the international system and replace it with an Islamo-fascist order? What planet are we on?

Yes, What planet ARE we on?

  1. Alan’s avatar

    The worst part is that the majority of American citizens will eat this stuff up with a spoon. They’ll blindly accept the “fact” that Iran is a threat to our safety, and they’ll fully support the next leader when he or she invades Iran. It makes me wonder if there is any hope for this country. Maybe, as long as people like you continue making an effort to let the truth be known!

  2. Mardé’s avatar

    Wow! Thanks for your comment Alan. Trouble is, How many people read this blog? Many more read where I got the above information, and especially also Juan Cole’s blog, but still, as you say, many people never see these blogs and the truthful perspectives. But if we didn’t have such blogs even less truthful information would be available. Thanks again, Alan.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>